STF

Discussion on Bill to Amend Fleet Command (Re submission)

Posted Aug. 4, 2019, 8:57 a.m. by Rear Admiral Krystelle McLean (FComm, Infinite Fleet / CMM) (Krystelle Knight)

Posted by Admiral Joe P (Librarian / TECH Chairman) in Discussion on Bill to Amend Fleet Command (Re submission)

Posted by Fleet Captain Adam W. (Former Ruler of the Club) in Discussion on Bill to Amend Fleet Command (Re submission)

Posted by Fleet Admiral James Sinclair (President) in Discussion on Bill to Amend Fleet Command (Re submission)
This is a proposal for an amendment to Fleet Command and Other Mundane Matters (FComm). Discussion will be open for 7 days, ending on 8/10/19.

Proposed Change:
- Change requirements to be a Fleet Commander or Assistant Fleet Commander

Original Text:
(Under the section of “Fleet Structure and Command”, the subsection “Restrictions”)
The Fleet Commander must be a current or former CO of the fleet in question, or a current or former XO in the fleet in question with CO experience. The Assistant Fleet Commander must be a current or former CO or XO of the fleet in question.

Proposed Revision:
The Fleet Commander must be a current or former CO, or a current XO with CO experience. The Assistant Fleet Commander must be a current or former CO or XO.

Fleet Admiral James Sinclair
President

I’d say:

The Fleet Commander must be a current or former CO. The Assistant Fleet Commander must be a current or former CO or XO.

As far as I can tell, what you had in the first sentence after the comma doesn’t add anything.

Adam

Yeah, I think I like Adam’s suggested wording a little better, because it clears up a potential source of ambiguity about whether Acting CO counts (even though it is explictly said later that it does not). Plus I’m all for brevity.

Joe

I would agree with the clearer wording.

Krys


Posts on The Command Ship

In topic

Posted since


© 1991-2024 STF. Terms of Service

Version 1.15.9