STF

Question for the Candidates

Posted March 10, 2019, 7:13 a.m. by Admiral Joe P (Election Coodinator) (Joe P)

Posted by Louis Harvatt in Question for the Candidates

Posted by Admiral Joe P (Election Coodinator) in Question for the Candidates
These questions are for everyone.

I don’t see a lot of visible effort being put in by anybody on the Election Ship at the moment. Some candidates are even talking in Discord about how bored they have been for the past few days. Usually Election Season isn’t boring for a candidate because they’re busy trying to demonstrate that they’re going to run the club proactively and that they’re a better choice to do that than their opponents. This doesn’t appear to be currently happening.

Why has your campaign posted so very little so far?

Do you plan on being a reactive President or a proactive President? Which do you think is better? Why?

– Joe

Hello Joe,

Thank you for providing us with this question. I plan to be both reactive and proactive in either the position of president or vice president. I will now go on to explain why I have chosen to be both. To begin with, the reason in which I have chosen to be reactive is that I plan to quickly react and resolve any situations that may pop up during Rob and myself term. Furthermore, the reason I also plan to be proactive is that I plan to help promote and actively involve myself in the Ideas of the club members and Robs and my ideas.

I look forward to hearing any of your follow up questions.

Louis Harvatt

As I told Rob, I find the answer of “both” to be self-contradictory and unpersuasive when there is nothing presented that indicates pro-activity on your own part.

Since you mentioned your own ideas, implying that they are different from Robs and the rest of the club’s, what are they?

Joe


Posts on Election Ship

In topic

Posted since


© 1991-2024 STF. Terms of Service

Version 1.15.9