STF

Draft Revised Placement Policy

Posted May 12, 2020, 1:25 p.m. by Vice Admiral Daniel Lerner (Personnel Director) (Daniel Lerner)

Posted by Joe P in Draft Revised Placement Policy

Posted by Vice Admiral Daniel Lerner (Personnel Director) in Draft Revised Placement Policy

Posted by Vice Admiral Daniel Lerner (Personnel Director) in Draft Revised Placement Policy
Posted by… suppressed (2) by the Post Ghost! 👻

SNIP everything else

Just one question.

The DH for the department under consideration must be active. For Academy placements, a DH who is on an LOA of any length is not considered active for this condition. for non-Academy placements, a DH who is on an iLOA (an LOA with no stated end-date) or an eLOA (an LOA with at least 30 days remaining) is not considered active for this condition.

What if the DH is on LOA, but is overdue from the return date?

Joe

Isn’t that an AWOL?

Daniel

Well, _I_think so, generally, but a lot of people get testy about that if they aren’t back but it’s still within the normal limit for that position (e.g. that your status counter resets magically to zero on your end date even when you haven’t actually come back yet).

Or an iLOA, given that there is now no return date?

Daniel

No, there’s still a return date, it’s just in the past instead of the future.

Joe

How about “… a DH who is on an iLOA (including an LOA with no stated end-date and an LOA that has past the stated end-date)…”?

I know not everyone will agree that it is an iLOA or AWOL or whatever, but until the club addresses that in the MOO bylaw, I feel the PDept can make a policy that best meets the intended goals here.

Daneil


Posts on Personnel Department

In topic

Posted since


© 1991-2024 STF. Terms of Service

Version 1.15.11